Control | + TBOA | p | Fold-change from control to TBOA | n (cells, mice) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT | |||||
Peak dF/F | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 1.07 ± 0.09 | <0.00001 | 7.0 ± 1.4 | 21, 4 |
Decay (s) | 2.79 ± 0.55 | 10.85 ± 1.24 | <0.00001 | 7.2 ± 2.1 | 21, 4 |
Area (dF/F · s) | 0.73 ± 0.14 | 5.18 ± 0.56 | <0.00001 | 10.3 ± 2.2 | 21, 4 |
R6/2 | |||||
Peak dF/F | 0.42 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.00025 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 25, 4 |
Decay (s) | 5.55 ± 0.40 | 12.77 ± 1.88 | 0.00037 | 2.5 ± 0.4 | 25, 4 |
Area (dF/F · s) | 1.20 ± 0.09 | 3.13 ± 0.53 | 0.00146 | 2.5 ± 0.4 | 25, 4 |
-
Data are from experiments such as those illustrated in Figure 7C, but summarized here for R6/2 and noncarrier controls (WT). TBOA significantly increased the EFS-evoked iGluSnFR signals in WT and R6/2 mice, but the fold changes were significantly greater in WT mice for all three comparisons of peak δF/F (p = 0.00132), decay time (p = 0.01696), and area (p = 0.00296) between WT and R6/2 mice. The mean values for fold changes calculated from individual experiments are shown.